A few months back, I Buy avomine travel sickness tablets attending a play that James Marsters
was in, The Why. And now, here's a brief recounting
of my experience seeing him in another type of live
appearance: playing a solo music gig at the 14 Below
bar in Santa Monica, CA last Saturday night. Accompanying
me was my friend Pam who went with me to The Why; she's
a huge Buffy fan and a fan of James in particular (she
jokingly calls him "my husband"). Also there
were our friends Dahlia and Jill, who are not Buffy
The place was packed - beyond packed - with Marsters fans. He was
the first act on the bill, and while the other bands on it had their
fans (there was a line around the block when we left, probably of
fans of the other bands that they were counting on packing in after
folks like us who just came to see James left), there was no doubt
who the people in that room were there to see. Indeed, one of the
other bands, who was doing a soundcheck when we came in, specifically
invited his fans to stay and be part of the audience for a live
video shoot they were doing! (Unfortunately for them, I didn't find
them that interesting, and I and the folks I was with had an early
day the next day.)
James came on at about 9:15 and played for about forty minutes,
playing mostly covers and a few originals on both electric and acoustic
guitars. (He covered Tom Waits, Springsteen, John Prine, etc.; I
especially was happy to hear him do one of my favorite Nirvana songs,
"On A Plain".) The set was marred by a *lot* of technical
problems - feedback, hard-to-hear vocals, and the pickup on the
acoustic not working at all (he had to mike it with a vocal mike
"the old-fashioned way"). He was good-humored about these
problems, even going so far as to blame it on himself ("I suck")
instead of the club.
Indeed, the best part of the performance was - well, him. His voice
and guitar playing were good but nothing spectacular. (My subject
line comes from something he said at one point, a pretty apt self-appraisal.)
What was pretty damned spectacular, though, was his charisma. You
can see it on Buffy, but seeing him live *really* showed this guy's
star quality. I actually enjoyed his actual music. And his sheer
presence was really astonishing. This guy has truly got it, whatever
And another thing - he is just stunningly handsome. He may be handsome
on TV and in still pictures, but - as both Dahlia and Jill observed
- he is even more good-looking live. Indeed, the audience was at
least 3/4 women! And one of the funniest things he said during the
night alluded to that. At one point, he introduced an original song
saying he had written it for a woman, who now wouldn't return his
phone calls. The crowd, predictably, responded with "awwww".
Cracking a smile (as he did through most of the night), he said,
"Oh, don't feel sorry for me." Again, indeed.
But for me, the best thing about his presence was just his sheer
joy. This is a guy in the first flush of flame, who is not in the
least jaded, who is grateful and having a ball. He's just so damned
positive! At one point, he talked about having a new car, for the
first time in his life not a used one. And he commented that he
had already crashed it. Another "awwww" from the audience.
But he replied, "Oh, that's OK! I have money now! It's already
fixed!" This didn't come off like bragging at all, but just
like someone who thinks he's the luckiest guy in the world. Very
Overall, a really fun experience seeing a guy who has a lot more
going for him than just Spike. Mark my words, folks: he'll be huge
Atorvastatin calcium 20 mg price with no additional benefits, and atorvastatin calcium 40 mg 60 cost added with no additional benefits.
The combination of Kann man amoxicillin ohne rezept kaufen calcium and statins has not had a consistent benefit to outcomes in controlled trials of patients with myocardial infarction.
The results of this study demonstrated an independent and non-inferior effect of atorvastatin calcium and statins in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. This confirms the previous studies demonstrating an overall reduction in myocardial infarction.
"It is also reassuring that the results were independent of quality adherence and to medication."
The results of this study are consistent with the previous meta-analyses of calcium and statins the recent meta-analysis on combined use of calcium and statins the development of acute MI. For some reasons, there have been several recent, strong trials in this area. However, these meta-analyses did not report any significant differences between the calcium and atorvastatin groups. This study has some of the strong clinical and biomarker characteristics of an effective therapy, allowing it to be more rigorous than the previous trials. In addition it had a longer follow-up, time point (12 months, compared with 8 months) and a high statistical power for primary analysis. The results of this study demonstrate an independent and non-inferior effect of atorvastatin calcium and statins in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. This confirms the previous studies demonstrating an overall reduction in myocardial infarction.In a previous randomised, controlled trial, dose-response relation was seen between reduced myocardial infarction at 12 months of atorvastatin calcium compared with no statin cholesterol control. This trial showed a benefit of atorvastatin calcium compared with placebo or no statin in the reduction acute myocardial infarction (an increased risk of a first, non-fatal myocardial infarction as shown in previous meta-analyses). This study cheap drugstore matte lipstick had a longer follow-up (3 years), an increased statistical power due to the duration of observation by a randomised, controlled trial and was less likely to have had a small sample size. These previous studies had several shortcomings, such as not being randomised, providing only one control treatment group and reporting the incidence rates of myocardial infarction in the statin and placebo treated groups in terms of crude and adjusted odds ratios.The results of this study demonstrated an independent and non-inferior effect of atorvastatin calcium and statins in terms of cardiovascular outcomes. This confirms the previous studies demonstrating an overall reduction in myocardial infarction.In the present trial results of randomised placebo and atorvastatin calcium groups were not statistically different, apart from a slightly higher increase in the percentage of responders after 12 months compared with the statin and placebo groups.
Comparison to the control group [ edit ]
Atorvastatin calcium, 40 mg and calcium levothyroxine (800 mg) 20 mg and cost added (each not available as a generic) also led to improvement in the ratio of overall cardiovascular events (hospital admissions, deaths, cardiac arrests and myocardial infarctions). All these changes were statistically highly significant.
There were fewer cases of myocardial infarction occurring in the stat.